In the past few weeks, the We Wuz Kangz crowd has taken it up a level. Spiderman's back in the news as being redone as mystery meat (and I believe not for the first time). We're supposed to celebrate that the transformation of Stockholm, North America is now complete, as the first ever BLACK Santa takes his place in the Mall of America, Mogadishu-on-Mississippi. Barbie is to be voiced by (((Amy Schumer))). And now we've got students at UPenn replacing a picture of Shakespeare in the English department with some mannish black power feminist in proto-problem glasses.
The end game is the destruction of white culture, so that they can claim that there is not and never was a white culture. And once there is no white culture, there will be no white people - and therefore no right to white communities or nations.
Genocide like a loaf of bread - slice by slice.
What's important here though is that this isn't the normal dindu We Wuz Kangz at work. We Wuz Kangz are generally a bunch of loud-mouthed retards who stand in the street in brightly colored robes and talk about how Cleopatra, Hannibal, Jesus, and King Tut were pretty much indistinguishable form your modern African-American google. This didn't really matter because nobody really is at all surprised that blacks don't understand that geography. Even though the whole continent is "Africa", the Sahara acted as a major barrier which, combined with the movement through the Mediterranean, meant that North Africa was historically more a part of the Middle East and Southern Europe than it was African, and certainly not Bantu Africa. Much like how Armenia isn't exactly filled with Chinese.
Nobody expects your average black to grasp this, so people just left it alone and if they wanted to put up a black Santa or LARP that there was more to black Africa than marveling at the architectural achievements of termites, then whatever. Annoying at times but not dangerous. And you can't really blame them for trying their honest best to put two and two together and then cheerfully deducing that of all options, five is the highest so let's roll with it.
Now though, (((other groups))), as well as virtue-signaling white opportunists, have decided to throw down with this as a tool to attack the white majority. And like most things black, once they are a weapon in someone else's hand they can actually be quite dangerous.
Expect it to pick up, and to move from the abstract of make believe holidays like Kwanzaa or long dead figures like King Tut and George Washington Carver, to more current and physical lies. Google is already doing this in its doodles (see the Juno team doodle vs. the actual team makeup, or their veteran's day doodles), as well as on their algorithms for searches like "American Engineers". This past year, Hermione Granger was played by a black woman, and despite seven books and everyone knowing damn well what's up, Rowling simply smirked, well, it never says explicitly, she's white. Right, and if I wrote a book about a witch named Kim in a school in Seoul without ever saying she wasn't Korean, you'd buy it a decade later when I told you she was a blond girl from Buffalo.
This is why though I don't countersignal with words like "sportsball" or mock those who aren't interested (yet) in fighting the race war at large but just want to protect the integrity of video games or comics or whatever - these are important fronts. And while it would be ridiculous for all of us to spend all our energies on them, the fact that we have stay behind crews willing to keep toiling away on them is not something to be dismissed. The enemy has people like this too - any front we abandon at all, for any length of time, will see ground lost. We must not allow our heritage to be stripped from us, in any way. Either in this overtly obnoxious way of saying it was always someone else's, but in the more insiduous way of declaring white culture, "global".
This is their second style of cultural destruction, and has been around for a while. Space Exploration, for instance, is a "human" achievement. Nevermind that this achievement centered around Germanics vs. Slavs, and even today has only expanded to include more types of Europeans and East Asians.
Tolkien, who explicitly wrote The Hobbit as an act of love for the AngloSaxon, ironically, because he felt that our ancient myths had been stolen from us when a conquered people, is never described as such. Try and declare Lord of The Rings to be an explicitly Anglo cultural work and you'll be mocked or insulted.
But today, Tolkien is global. Disney is global. Beethoven is global. Granted, it's a step up from Tolkien wuz kangz, but it's just a slightly more palatable cultural genocide. Still leads to our destruction.
No subversion of our culture that seeks to deny our position in it ought be tolerated.
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
Saturday, December 10, 2016
Fourth Estate, Fifth Column, Trump's Sixth Sense
Oh no! Trump told a rally on his "Thank You" tour that he isn't really interested in locking Hillary up. Shut it down!
The media is of course gloating about this betrayal of the base, from twitter to the MSM.
Good. Let them sell us the rope.
The left makes three fundamental errors regarding both Trump and the presidency:
1. The president is the boss of all branches of government. This is what they believe. This is why they saw no legal barrier (they never had a moral one) to Obama doing whatever he wanted, and why their concern about Republican presidents is always one of fear of the always assumed dictatorial powers now in the hands of the enemy.
2. That Trump (and his followers) are complete idiots.
3. That they cannot help themselves at biting at bait regarding the above. Trump already trolled them with the flag protection proposal.
Do you really think there's nothing more going on here than Trump dismissing a huge part of his base's enthusiasm at his own victory tour? Or is Trump, a man with a lifetime of playing with the media and two years of being the undisputed master of it, doing something more?
Here's what I see:
- Trump, contrary to how Democrats picture it, personally has no legal authority to go after Hillary as president. That is up to Congress to investigate, the FBI to investigate, and for the AG (Sessions, aka not-a-cuck) to prosecute. Trump has leverage over all these groups to differing and greater or lesser degrees, but they are all officially independent in their investigations and conclusions.
- So Trump says he's not interesting in doing something now that, as president, wasn't his job anyway. And the media, convinced Trump is an idiot and unable to resist trying to blackpill those of us on the train, are busy writing articles about how Trump has no intention of hitting Hillary now. They are producing a paper trail alibi for Trump and they don't even notice.
- If Congress, the FBI, and the AG cannot for whatever reason get Hillary, Trump shrugs and says that's in the past and he's said so for months that he has more important things to do. This is, technically, true. Wall & Deportations > Clinton, every time. It's also true because again, going after Hillary wasn't something the president is supposed to do.
- If (we hope and pray and believe there will be), there is an indictment, then the MSM will gear up to paint the whole thing as a politically motivated hitjob... and the Trump administration will have phonebooks worth of documentation from the exact same members of the press, gloating that president-elect Trump has no such intentions whatsoever.
Progressives, BTFO. We will never get tired of winning.
Throw in the fact that right now, Obama has to weigh the public optics of a pardon against the risk of it being needed. No sense in being seen to throw out the smoking gun if no investigation is forthcoming anyway. This is especially true if Obama wants to try and play the Washington elder statesman role rather than pissing off to Hawaii like he should.
Trump is all about violating his enemy's expectations. He railed in the campaign about this, particularly regarding ISIS and Obama's administration releasing military schedules, but it was a general theme and has been all of Trump's life. Trump is giving his enemies nothing to work with, while making them work for him.
No blackpills, fam. When and only when Trump actually starts implementing a cuck policy is it time to fire the broadside. I know we're not used to having a leader who smiles and assures our enemies while he prepares the kidney shiv (something the other side does often and well - DOMA, DADT...), but I truly believe we have such a man now. Give him the opportunity to work the magic.
The media is of course gloating about this betrayal of the base, from twitter to the MSM.
Good. Let them sell us the rope.
The left makes three fundamental errors regarding both Trump and the presidency:
1. The president is the boss of all branches of government. This is what they believe. This is why they saw no legal barrier (they never had a moral one) to Obama doing whatever he wanted, and why their concern about Republican presidents is always one of fear of the always assumed dictatorial powers now in the hands of the enemy.
2. That Trump (and his followers) are complete idiots.
3. That they cannot help themselves at biting at bait regarding the above. Trump already trolled them with the flag protection proposal.
Do you really think there's nothing more going on here than Trump dismissing a huge part of his base's enthusiasm at his own victory tour? Or is Trump, a man with a lifetime of playing with the media and two years of being the undisputed master of it, doing something more?
Here's what I see:
- Trump, contrary to how Democrats picture it, personally has no legal authority to go after Hillary as president. That is up to Congress to investigate, the FBI to investigate, and for the AG (Sessions, aka not-a-cuck) to prosecute. Trump has leverage over all these groups to differing and greater or lesser degrees, but they are all officially independent in their investigations and conclusions.
- So Trump says he's not interesting in doing something now that, as president, wasn't his job anyway. And the media, convinced Trump is an idiot and unable to resist trying to blackpill those of us on the train, are busy writing articles about how Trump has no intention of hitting Hillary now. They are producing a paper trail alibi for Trump and they don't even notice.
- If Congress, the FBI, and the AG cannot for whatever reason get Hillary, Trump shrugs and says that's in the past and he's said so for months that he has more important things to do. This is, technically, true. Wall & Deportations > Clinton, every time. It's also true because again, going after Hillary wasn't something the president is supposed to do.
- If (we hope and pray and believe there will be), there is an indictment, then the MSM will gear up to paint the whole thing as a politically motivated hitjob... and the Trump administration will have phonebooks worth of documentation from the exact same members of the press, gloating that president-elect Trump has no such intentions whatsoever.
Progressives, BTFO. We will never get tired of winning.
Throw in the fact that right now, Obama has to weigh the public optics of a pardon against the risk of it being needed. No sense in being seen to throw out the smoking gun if no investigation is forthcoming anyway. This is especially true if Obama wants to try and play the Washington elder statesman role rather than pissing off to Hawaii like he should.
Trump is all about violating his enemy's expectations. He railed in the campaign about this, particularly regarding ISIS and Obama's administration releasing military schedules, but it was a general theme and has been all of Trump's life. Trump is giving his enemies nothing to work with, while making them work for him.
No blackpills, fam. When and only when Trump actually starts implementing a cuck policy is it time to fire the broadside. I know we're not used to having a leader who smiles and assures our enemies while he prepares the kidney shiv (something the other side does often and well - DOMA, DADT...), but I truly believe we have such a man now. Give him the opportunity to work the magic.
Thursday, December 8, 2016
Rural Aesthetics (UK Edition)
Earlier, I wrote about how there is a large element of
culture that generally goes unnoticed in and of itself, but that significantly
contributes to the general spirit of the nation. I called this ‘low culture’
not as a snub, but because it is less at the forefront of the mind than say,
the cultural impact of Star Wars or Pablo
Picasso.
I classified architecture as ‘high culture’ – certainly the
Sydney Opera House or Empire State Building are – and even in a more general
sense, city designs and public buildings change from country to country and
make a noticeable, publicly recognized difference. But what gets less coverage
is just as important – the rural aesthetic.
As my penname suggests, I am an Anglo-Saxon, and have close
ties with England. I will use England as my example here, but have seen the
same pattern, though the specifics obviously differ.
For me, the English countryside has three distinguishing,
man-made features: Walls, Farmhouses, and the Freedom to Roam.
Walls: Walls in the English countryside are generally
drywall, and are everywhere. Not just
along well-farmed estates, but in desolate moorland and up mountains in the Lake
District or further north along scree-laden slopes that it seems ridiculous
anyone would have ever bothered to climb, let alone while carrying and
rearranging heavy stones for miles and miles. This is different from Scotland
where, in my experience, they only built walls where it was sensible and
purposeful to do so.
In addition, stone walls in England have jagged tops. I have
been told by locals, though I have never confirmed through any written source,
that this is because it prevents heavy buildup of snow. By contrast, Irish
stone walls have flat tops. This makes for an interesting transition in the
north of England, where walls around Liverpool and then up through Lancashire
have quite a few ‘Irish’ walls, a legacy of Irish laborers who came to that
area looking for work. Then as one moves westwards towards and across the Pennines,
the walls become increasingly ‘English’.
Farmhouses: Old farmhouses too are generally made of stone,
as are the outbuildings. It lasts in a way wood does not, especially in a wet
climate, and England has had centuries of having to treat local timber as a
high-value strategic resource. Up north, the farmhouses increasingly resemble
fortresses, which stems from the fact that they often were, back when Anglo and Pict and Scot didn’t let something as
trivial as national borders or Common Law get in the way of a good
old-fashioned bloodbath.
I have spent less time hiking in the south of England than
the north, but the farmland is more prosperous and also closer to the urban
centers, and so while there is still a heavy use of stone, they don’t tend to
double as a defense against a medium-sized army of sheep raiders. There is an
interesting juxtaposition in Yorkshire – particularly around Richmond and York –
which were historically very prosperous and it shows in the farm houses. These
are very nice fortresses.
Freedom to Roam: Scottish law is similar but slightly
different from England & Wales. In all cases though, the general gist is
that if a footpath has existed, the public has a right to walk upon it. The
public also has the right to ‘roam’ on public lands, where ‘roam’ means the
right to walk, to sit and rest, and in a delightfully British way of speaking,
the right to picnic and watercolour. If the land is held privately (such as on
a farm), the farmer may reroute you but must provide a route through that is
reasonable: he can direct you around the edge of a field rather than through
it; he can’t send you three miles down the road.
‘Commons’ in England are much more common in the north than
in the south, due to urban growth and the enclosure acts back when
industrialization was starting up. The Commons today tends to be very marginal
land, and when used is pretty much used for sheep grazing and grouse hunting,
with little infrastructure beyond the ubiquitous stone walls and the occasional
stone cabin that serves while hunting said grouse.
The net result is a web of public footpaths all
interconnected to common land such that it is possible to go from Land’s End to
John O’Groats on foot without more than few miles of walking on a road.
I guarantee that not once have you been in an argument about
whether British people have culture, and someone brought up the freedom to roam
and the right to watercolour a pointy-topped stone wall. But in sum, the result
is that you can be anywhere in England and not only know that you are in England without a sign or another person, but
you can know in broad terms where in England you are.
It results in a cohesive
national identity with all the regional diversity that progressives insist only
comes from importing Mogadishu. It is the result of a high trust society where
a stranger is still a countryman and so can be trusted onto one’s land to do
nothing more but walk across and admire the view. It is lovely, and if you go
to England I highly recommend taking time out of the London – Oxford –
Stonehenge – Edinburgh blitz and spending as long as you can in the Cotswolds,
The Wye River Valley, the Norfolk Broads, The Yorkshire Dales and Moors, the
Lake District, the Pennine Way, Snowdonia, West Highland Way... take your pick.
Monday, December 5, 2016
When Carson Is Tapped, You Are Not Racist
Regarding Republicans, "The Magic Negro" refers to the conservative desire to find a black man who holds all the right conservative views but whose skin color will, finally, for real this time, prove to the leftists who hold the keys to Georgetown Dinner Parties that they are not racist. "The Magic Negro" is slightly different in reference to the left, primarily because they don't care about what Republicans think of them. In reference to the left, "The Magic Negro" is a black man who is coherent and capable enough that he can run as the front man and so bludgeon conservatives on their racism and privilege.
Ben Carson was the Magic Negro of 2016, replacing Herman Cain, who in turn had replaced Colin Powell. It's somewhat important to note that the term "Magic Negro" does not inherently marginalize the individual's actual talents, but merely mocks the idea that that talent somehow justifies being made the leader of a national political party. I say inherently because frankly, there are Magic Negros who aren't even particularly good in their supposed area of expertise, but simply are nonthreatening enough and the cuck desperate enough to let even that deficiency slide. Neil Degrasse Tyson is the most current example of the full blown case, and if I had a time machine I'd bet my last Reese's Pieces that George Washington Carver would at the very least be a borderline case.
There are certainly those that think Carson and Cain fall into that camp of being all shuck and jive, and others who acknowledge that the two are indeed Magic Negros but that it is unfair to claim they don't have a very respectable list of core competencies. Pick you poison.
As an aside, my preferred term for Magic Negros in modern parlance is "Google Plus".
So with that out the way - Ben Carson has been tapped to head up HUD. With an understanding of what we mean by Magic Negro, and that - politically, at the very least - Ben Carson is one, here are my thoughts:
1. If anyone could marginalize that Magic Negro card, it's Trump. Trump is rewarding Carson for his loyalty, and while there's probably a good chunk of influence demanding to have a Magic Negro in the cabinet, it's a lot less an influence on Trump as it would be for a cuck. Trump is under no illusions that by choosing Carson he's tapping into a magical force that will neutralize his opponents, nor does he take screams of RACISS seriously.
2. Carson has actually lived in public housing, so I'm counting this as a plus. This isn't always the case - I wouldn't want a guy who had never been employed to be in charge of Labor on the basis that he "knows how tough it can be" (arguments as to whether anyone should be in charge of Labor notwithstanding). But just as I think there should always be a non-lawyer, non-Ivy SCOTUS justice, Having a guy in charge of a department where he had to eat some of the shit handed out by said dept... well, why not give it a whirl?
3. And... not much else. Carson was loyal, is not a lifetime politican and has seen the end-user side of the department, but he lacks any depth in relevant experience and is a danger of being given a pass (by the right) for being a Magic Negro.
I'm giving him a 6/10. If he were white, he'd be seen at best as a smart loyalist who is bland enough to not offend any wing of the party. That he's not a Bushman would give him a +1 with the party base. So 6/10 if white, 6/10 as black.
Personally, I wish HUD would be weaponized to shove diversity down the throats of those who like to virtue signal that America needs more diversity. Section 8 housing at Martha's Vineyard. Subsidized housing to move kebab (before final deportation) from Ohio to San Francisco. Urban Development that moves yahoos into (((homogeneous neighborhoods))). Properly enriching top tier public schools.
But that's probably a step too far for most people right now, so using HUD to repay a Trump loyalist who hopefully is up to the task seems the next best thing.
Wednesday, November 30, 2016
Election Pop Quiz
In memory of the big, beautiful election we just had: Remembering The Primaries
1. Before he was low-energy, Jeb! was
A) An embarrassment
B) A big, fat mistake
C) A mess
D) A real tough guy
2. "Disgusting" BEST describes:
A) John Kasich eating a Hoagie
B) DNC abusing Bernie supporters
C) Hillary lying about Honest Abe
D) Rosie O'Donnell
3. Who of the following was the first person, who, to be very honest with you, shouldn't even be here tonight?
A) Jeb Bush
B) Ted Cruz
C) John Kasich
D) Little Marco
4. A water bottle represented Marco Rubio's:
A) Foam parties
B) Profuse sweat
C) Spittle
D) On-screen water drinking
5. Chris Christie famously committed a murder-suicide against this Cuban:
A) Ted Cruz
B) Fidel Castro
C) Marco Rubio
D) John Kasich's sandwich
6. Trump will NEVER:
A) Win a primary
B) Get 25% of the vote in a primary
C) Even be competitive in a purple state
D) All of the above
7. Before Jeb!, there was:
A) Forward with Jeb
B) Stand Tough With Jeb
C) Jeb Can Fix It
D) Jeb For President
8. This candidate actually lost to Trump, twice:
A) Newt Gingrich
B) Carly Fiorina
C) Ben Carson
D) Rand Paul
9. Trump first broke the 50% ceiling officially in this historically racist state:
A) Georgia
B) Connecticut
C) Mississippi
D) Texas
10. Jeb! was interrupted and forced to stop mid-speech by his hosts at:
A) A Relay-For-Life fundraiser
B) A church picnic
C) A fundraising event in a private home.
D) A Rotary Club meeting
1. Before he was low-energy, Jeb! was
A) An embarrassment
B) A big, fat mistake
C) A mess
D) A real tough guy
2. "Disgusting" BEST describes:
A) John Kasich eating a Hoagie
B) DNC abusing Bernie supporters
C) Hillary lying about Honest Abe
D) Rosie O'Donnell
3. Who of the following was the first person, who, to be very honest with you, shouldn't even be here tonight?
A) Jeb Bush
B) Ted Cruz
C) John Kasich
D) Little Marco
4. A water bottle represented Marco Rubio's:
A) Foam parties
B) Profuse sweat
C) Spittle
D) On-screen water drinking
5. Chris Christie famously committed a murder-suicide against this Cuban:
A) Ted Cruz
B) Fidel Castro
C) Marco Rubio
D) John Kasich's sandwich
6. Trump will NEVER:
A) Win a primary
B) Get 25% of the vote in a primary
C) Even be competitive in a purple state
D) All of the above
7. Before Jeb!, there was:
A) Forward with Jeb
B) Stand Tough With Jeb
C) Jeb Can Fix It
D) Jeb For President
8. This candidate actually lost to Trump, twice:
A) Newt Gingrich
B) Carly Fiorina
C) Ben Carson
D) Rand Paul
9. Trump first broke the 50% ceiling officially in this historically racist state:
A) Georgia
B) Connecticut
C) Mississippi
D) Texas
10. Jeb! was interrupted and forced to stop mid-speech by his hosts at:
A) A Relay-For-Life fundraiser
B) A church picnic
C) A fundraising event in a private home.
D) A Rotary Club meeting
Monday, November 28, 2016
Drain The 9th Circle Of Hell
California went Democrat at a rate of 2:1, and is at the point of serious-not-serious as to whether or not it can tolerate being tied to the rest of us.
Hawaii, America's great Coldwar Exhibit A that The Free World, Inc. was open to non-white majority countries, went by the same ratio.
So did the People's Republic of Massachusetts.
The nation's capital, on the other hand, went to Clinton by an absolutely staggering 19:1. This is Yuge.
Now yes, I am aware that California, Hawaii, and Massachusetts are states, and therefore have some degree of variance throughout. But consider: The San Francisco area peaked at 75%. Parts of Boston pushed towards 90% but the city as a whole was around 80%. New York City was around 80%. Atlanta, in the mid 70's. Portlandia, 70's. Seattle, 70's. Chicago, 75%. Even Baltimore... 85%. So even when only compared to the bluest of the blue urban areas, Washington, D.C. is an extreme outlier.
The only thing this election more alarming (though not unrelated), was the fact that somehow not a single national paper was in sync with half the country, comprising north of fifty-million voters. Looking at DC, the only conclusion is that we are ruled by a capital that has less in common with the people it claims the authority to govern than London ever had with India or Versailles had with The Vendée. Something many of us have always instinctively understood, but it's amazing to see it play out by the numbers, every four years. It is a city that is foreign, hostile, and absolutely thrilled to find itself so separated from the occupied territories.
President Donald J. Trump is literally entering a warzone. Keep your memes locked and your shitposts loaded lads; we won an important battle that the enemy couldn't really believe was actually being fought. But now they are terrified, and the next battle is on a battlefield that they know well and where every pedocuck and (((global lobbyist))) has spent a lifetime honing xir skills. Things are going to get much worse before they get better, because the swamp is going to do everything it can to avoid being drained.
But when it does, I believe that the change - the sudden disappearance of an oppression so old it never fully registered - will be so profound on the American people that liberalism can be destroyed for generations. This is why we must win, and to do that we must appreciate how desperate the enemy will be to prevent us from doing so. Don't get cocky.
Hawaii, America's great Coldwar Exhibit A that The Free World, Inc. was open to non-white majority countries, went by the same ratio.
So did the People's Republic of Massachusetts.
The nation's capital, on the other hand, went to Clinton by an absolutely staggering 19:1. This is Yuge.
Now yes, I am aware that California, Hawaii, and Massachusetts are states, and therefore have some degree of variance throughout. But consider: The San Francisco area peaked at 75%. Parts of Boston pushed towards 90% but the city as a whole was around 80%. New York City was around 80%. Atlanta, in the mid 70's. Portlandia, 70's. Seattle, 70's. Chicago, 75%. Even Baltimore... 85%. So even when only compared to the bluest of the blue urban areas, Washington, D.C. is an extreme outlier.
The only thing this election more alarming (though not unrelated), was the fact that somehow not a single national paper was in sync with half the country, comprising north of fifty-million voters. Looking at DC, the only conclusion is that we are ruled by a capital that has less in common with the people it claims the authority to govern than London ever had with India or Versailles had with The Vendée. Something many of us have always instinctively understood, but it's amazing to see it play out by the numbers, every four years. It is a city that is foreign, hostile, and absolutely thrilled to find itself so separated from the occupied territories.
President Donald J. Trump is literally entering a warzone. Keep your memes locked and your shitposts loaded lads; we won an important battle that the enemy couldn't really believe was actually being fought. But now they are terrified, and the next battle is on a battlefield that they know well and where every pedocuck and (((global lobbyist))) has spent a lifetime honing xir skills. Things are going to get much worse before they get better, because the swamp is going to do everything it can to avoid being drained.
But when it does, I believe that the change - the sudden disappearance of an oppression so old it never fully registered - will be so profound on the American people that liberalism can be destroyed for generations. This is why we must win, and to do that we must appreciate how desperate the enemy will be to prevent us from doing so. Don't get cocky.
An Elite Without A People...
...And now, it appears, a faction without a leader.
As contradictory as those two statements may appear, Trump may have twisted the #NeverTrump cucks into this gloriously untenable position. By having Romney come bowing and scraping, he has denied the #NeverTrump the remaining front-man of any sign that he opposed Trump on true principal. This group is done.
Bill Kristol
David French
Egg McMuffin
Glenn Beck
Mitt Romney
And if he forgets, he'll be gone next time around too. He's got two years to rehabilitate, and that clock is ticking.
Things are looking good. By the time January 20th rolls around, internal opposition will be utterly crushed, we will have moral authority to do a complete audit of the voting system, courtesy of libtards screaming about Michigan and Wisconsin, and we will be able to roll through the nomination process of cabinet members and a SCOTUS justice without a peep about muh sacred filibuster.
We're winning. And we're nowhere close to being tired of it.
And if we're in a position to start the first inning with a declaration that not only are we deporting all illegal criminals already noted on the books, but we're going to do a precinct-by-precinct audit and deport w/o possibility of return any illegal who voted, then that would just make my Christmas.
As contradictory as those two statements may appear, Trump may have twisted the #NeverTrump cucks into this gloriously untenable position. By having Romney come bowing and scraping, he has denied the #NeverTrump the remaining front-man of any sign that he opposed Trump on true principal. This group is done.
And if he forgets, he'll be gone next time around too. He's got two years to rehabilitate, and that clock is ticking.
Things are looking good. By the time January 20th rolls around, internal opposition will be utterly crushed, we will have moral authority to do a complete audit of the voting system, courtesy of libtards screaming about Michigan and Wisconsin, and we will be able to roll through the nomination process of cabinet members and a SCOTUS justice without a peep about muh sacred filibuster.
We're winning. And we're nowhere close to being tired of it.
And if we're in a position to start the first inning with a declaration that not only are we deporting all illegal criminals already noted on the books, but we're going to do a precinct-by-precinct audit and deport w/o possibility of return any illegal who voted, then that would just make my Christmas.
Friday, November 25, 2016
What Is Culture?
On the one hand, writing this article feels a little pointless, because the same people who like to shout that white people have no culture also like to shout about how they wuz kangz with flying pyramids, so laying out a dialectical argument is perhaps not going to be very effective.
However, I see plenty of whites who when screamed at about no culture don't seem to have any response. My intention here therefore isn't to provide a dialectic rebuttal to the other side's idiots, but to give our own people so framework from which to form their own rhetoric. Good luck!
I will be referring to 'white culture'. This is a phenomena that really only exists in the United States and perhaps Canada: Europeans are not culturally homogenous. Spain is not Sweden is not Hungary. But, for the purposes of this essay these cultures are close enough - especially when compared to non-European cultures - that I believe the term is acceptable.
For simplicity's sake, there are two types of 'culture' that any given society produces. The first, and most obvious, is what I call 'high culture'. This encompasses culture that is produced for consumption, and is comprised of literature, music, performance and fine art, architecture, sports, holidays, science, language, religion... you get the picture. Shakespeare is high culture. So is NASCAR.
For high culture, it is fairly easy to rebut enemy claims, which it is why it is usually only googles who make it. Most of the world plays soccer. White Culture. Baseball, American football, hockey, basketball... products of white culture. Disney films primarily based off of fairy tales: white culture based off of white culture. The Aircraft Carrier. White Culture. Sure, your Shaqwanda or Tyrone are going to deny this, and your problem glasses feminist or resident Echoberg will try and claim everything actually stems from some Aztec or Iroquois or Arab, but the fact is that the cultural output by whites in everything from throwing a ball to performing a play to landing on the moon is so blatant and overwhelming that there's no real danger of whites not being able to defend their own on this turf, unless they're determined to cuck in which case nothing I say matters anyway.
The only exception is music where whites tend to be happy to cuck even when they wouldn't otherwise, and accept black claims that all music is stolen from them to a greater or lesser degree. To which I'd ask how they can claim reasonably Jazz when they can't claim the saxophone or the piano. Or Music Theory. White musical tradition is as rich as relevant as any other part of our culture, and we should not let them get away with this, but again - it's not particularly difficult to make third parties realize that 'whites have no culture' is a bullshit claim, even for music.
But then there is what I'll term 'low culture', which isn't any less meaningful but is much more passive, less overt than its high culture counterpart, but in many ways is the most important.
Low culture is the often unspoken, unwritten rules that define how members of that culture interact. For instance, how does a culture respond to authority? Between civilian and warriors, police, bureaucrats? Juniors to Seniors? Sons to Fathers? Employees to Employers? When we talk, we understand that there is a cultural difference on this issue between say, Americans and Japanese. Even though there's no tangible culture in the same way we see a cultural difference between anime and western cartoons.
That's hardly the only one. The role of family, both nuclear and extended. How are morals and ethics valued? High versus Low Trust societies. Public versus Private space. Concept of Adulthood. Expectations of Motherhood. For every group from Anglo to Aborigine, we could research each of these topics and we would discover 1. An overwhelming general trend within a group and 2. Significant difference between groups.
Here is the challenge. If some dindu comes up and starts going on and on about no culture, it doesn't sound very convincing to rebut with well actually, we do have a culture, and it's centered around a high-trust homogenous society with a historical streak of egalitarian libertarianism that is acknowledged but kept in check by a traditionally strong church and...
Which is unfortunate, because that's the part of the culture these people immigrated to our countries for. They didn't come because we invent great sports or have funny musicals or figured out how to make airplanes; they came because culturally we have formed a very safe, very trusting society that is open to outsiders coming in and becoming not only wealthy, but actually benefitting from - again, culturally constructed - welfare programs built on a national sense of 'help your neighbor'.
It is therefore very important that other whites be made to see that this is what is going on. Once our wealth and safety are viewed as a direct consequence of a white culture, the outsider will naturally be viewed as a hostile cuckoo, not a friendly-but-unfortunate neighbor. Likewise, people might begin to realize that this safety is not guaranteed: as whites become a minority our culture will be replaced by their cultures: which generally range from persecuting outsiders, to tolerating the useful ones with the occasional purge thrown in, to full out rape-and-murder.
I urge you, the next time a 'no culture' claim is made, to not only score the rhetorical points on the obvious contributions of whites in high culture, but to point out that the very threads of the society they live in are the result of white people codifying their interactions with one another over centuries. You won't make any headway against those people in particular, but you may make an important point to bystanders - and when you're arguing with googles, it's the bystanders you're really reaching out to anyway.
However, I see plenty of whites who when screamed at about no culture don't seem to have any response. My intention here therefore isn't to provide a dialectic rebuttal to the other side's idiots, but to give our own people so framework from which to form their own rhetoric. Good luck!
I will be referring to 'white culture'. This is a phenomena that really only exists in the United States and perhaps Canada: Europeans are not culturally homogenous. Spain is not Sweden is not Hungary. But, for the purposes of this essay these cultures are close enough - especially when compared to non-European cultures - that I believe the term is acceptable.
For simplicity's sake, there are two types of 'culture' that any given society produces. The first, and most obvious, is what I call 'high culture'. This encompasses culture that is produced for consumption, and is comprised of literature, music, performance and fine art, architecture, sports, holidays, science, language, religion... you get the picture. Shakespeare is high culture. So is NASCAR.
For high culture, it is fairly easy to rebut enemy claims, which it is why it is usually only googles who make it. Most of the world plays soccer. White Culture. Baseball, American football, hockey, basketball... products of white culture. Disney films primarily based off of fairy tales: white culture based off of white culture. The Aircraft Carrier. White Culture. Sure, your Shaqwanda or Tyrone are going to deny this, and your problem glasses feminist or resident Echoberg will try and claim everything actually stems from some Aztec or Iroquois or Arab, but the fact is that the cultural output by whites in everything from throwing a ball to performing a play to landing on the moon is so blatant and overwhelming that there's no real danger of whites not being able to defend their own on this turf, unless they're determined to cuck in which case nothing I say matters anyway.
The only exception is music where whites tend to be happy to cuck even when they wouldn't otherwise, and accept black claims that all music is stolen from them to a greater or lesser degree. To which I'd ask how they can claim reasonably Jazz when they can't claim the saxophone or the piano. Or Music Theory. White musical tradition is as rich as relevant as any other part of our culture, and we should not let them get away with this, but again - it's not particularly difficult to make third parties realize that 'whites have no culture' is a bullshit claim, even for music.
But then there is what I'll term 'low culture', which isn't any less meaningful but is much more passive, less overt than its high culture counterpart, but in many ways is the most important.
Low culture is the often unspoken, unwritten rules that define how members of that culture interact. For instance, how does a culture respond to authority? Between civilian and warriors, police, bureaucrats? Juniors to Seniors? Sons to Fathers? Employees to Employers? When we talk, we understand that there is a cultural difference on this issue between say, Americans and Japanese. Even though there's no tangible culture in the same way we see a cultural difference between anime and western cartoons.
That's hardly the only one. The role of family, both nuclear and extended. How are morals and ethics valued? High versus Low Trust societies. Public versus Private space. Concept of Adulthood. Expectations of Motherhood. For every group from Anglo to Aborigine, we could research each of these topics and we would discover 1. An overwhelming general trend within a group and 2. Significant difference between groups.
Here is the challenge. If some dindu comes up and starts going on and on about no culture, it doesn't sound very convincing to rebut with well actually, we do have a culture, and it's centered around a high-trust homogenous society with a historical streak of egalitarian libertarianism that is acknowledged but kept in check by a traditionally strong church and...
Which is unfortunate, because that's the part of the culture these people immigrated to our countries for. They didn't come because we invent great sports or have funny musicals or figured out how to make airplanes; they came because culturally we have formed a very safe, very trusting society that is open to outsiders coming in and becoming not only wealthy, but actually benefitting from - again, culturally constructed - welfare programs built on a national sense of 'help your neighbor'.
It is therefore very important that other whites be made to see that this is what is going on. Once our wealth and safety are viewed as a direct consequence of a white culture, the outsider will naturally be viewed as a hostile cuckoo, not a friendly-but-unfortunate neighbor. Likewise, people might begin to realize that this safety is not guaranteed: as whites become a minority our culture will be replaced by their cultures: which generally range from persecuting outsiders, to tolerating the useful ones with the occasional purge thrown in, to full out rape-and-murder.
I urge you, the next time a 'no culture' claim is made, to not only score the rhetorical points on the obvious contributions of whites in high culture, but to point out that the very threads of the society they live in are the result of white people codifying their interactions with one another over centuries. You won't make any headway against those people in particular, but you may make an important point to bystanders - and when you're arguing with googles, it's the bystanders you're really reaching out to anyway.
Wednesday, November 23, 2016
Nikki Goes To New York
Trump isn't always playing 4D chess. He makes mistakes.
Nimrata Randhawa for UN Ambassador isn't one of them. This is brilliant. Consider:
1. South Carolina now can elect a governor who actually understands and supports South Carolina.
2. Globalists in the UN have precisely nothing to rally around. They don't get an old school neocon or Israeli-firster with deep connections. They get a lightweight governor who hits the multicultural check-boxes and little else. No leverage, no conduit into the administration.
3. Epic troll move. Trump has neutralized the first wave of 'muh women, muh minorities'. And even better, he gave her a worthless position that nobody can admit it worthless. Globalists have to pretend that the UN ambassador is a prestigious, meaningful position in the US power structure. But of course they know it's not. Nikki can wine and dine in Manhattan and be the face of Diversity, Inc while the rest of us get down to the work of Making America Great Again. Win-win.
This won't shut up the Raciss, Sexiss crowd for good of course, but we don't care if they shout anyway. What this does do though is discredit them to normies if they start shouting too loudly. It makes Trump look less dangerous, less radical... all while the left rants impotently and we start shipping people south of the wall as fast as the buses can run.
I expect to see several moves like this from Trump. Positions that really matter for our top priorities - restoring this nation's demographics and getting rid of those that want to kill us - must go to white men of good nationalist character. Men like Sessions and Kobach. Attorney General. State. Defense. Energy & Interior also deserve worthy candidates dedicated to Winning as well. But the UN? Smoke and mirrors my friends. Hell, I wouldn't be terribly surprised if Romney gets some position that he can go full economic wonk on, restructuring like the Salt Lake Olympics, but something that is low profile enough and "bipartisan" and won't make Romney the number one cuck in 2024. Something that everyone agrees needs fixing. Romney, Gabbard, Webb: those types will do for us what people like McCain and Specter do for the left.
Use the labor of our enemies for our own interests. This is what the left has done to whites for my entire life. Tables are turning.
Remember everyone, Trump spent months mocking Obama and Hillary for broadcasting their plans to our enemies in advance; we don't want or expect Trump to give the enemy our roadmap before we're even officially in the driver's seat.
Nimrata Randhawa for UN Ambassador isn't one of them. This is brilliant. Consider:
1. South Carolina now can elect a governor who actually understands and supports South Carolina.
2. Globalists in the UN have precisely nothing to rally around. They don't get an old school neocon or Israeli-firster with deep connections. They get a lightweight governor who hits the multicultural check-boxes and little else. No leverage, no conduit into the administration.
3. Epic troll move. Trump has neutralized the first wave of 'muh women, muh minorities'. And even better, he gave her a worthless position that nobody can admit it worthless. Globalists have to pretend that the UN ambassador is a prestigious, meaningful position in the US power structure. But of course they know it's not. Nikki can wine and dine in Manhattan and be the face of Diversity, Inc while the rest of us get down to the work of Making America Great Again. Win-win.
This won't shut up the Raciss, Sexiss crowd for good of course, but we don't care if they shout anyway. What this does do though is discredit them to normies if they start shouting too loudly. It makes Trump look less dangerous, less radical... all while the left rants impotently and we start shipping people south of the wall as fast as the buses can run.
I expect to see several moves like this from Trump. Positions that really matter for our top priorities - restoring this nation's demographics and getting rid of those that want to kill us - must go to white men of good nationalist character. Men like Sessions and Kobach. Attorney General. State. Defense. Energy & Interior also deserve worthy candidates dedicated to Winning as well. But the UN? Smoke and mirrors my friends. Hell, I wouldn't be terribly surprised if Romney gets some position that he can go full economic wonk on, restructuring like the Salt Lake Olympics, but something that is low profile enough and "bipartisan" and won't make Romney the number one cuck in 2024. Something that everyone agrees needs fixing. Romney, Gabbard, Webb: those types will do for us what people like McCain and Specter do for the left.
Use the labor of our enemies for our own interests. This is what the left has done to whites for my entire life. Tables are turning.
Remember everyone, Trump spent months mocking Obama and Hillary for broadcasting their plans to our enemies in advance; we don't want or expect Trump to give the enemy our roadmap before we're even officially in the driver's seat.
Tuesday, November 22, 2016
Keep Your Powder Dry
We haven't won anything yet. We don't have the wall. We don't even have the White House for another 60 days, and you can be sure the usual suspects are going to come up with some bullshit to try between then and now. Be great if we could keep the coalition together for a while longer - we all want them to go back.
End of day, what happened over the past few days is not a big deal as a single event. Normies are not going to ever remember it, and a good chunk that do see it will just assume it's the usual bullshit RACISS narrative of the MSM. The biggest danger here is we tear ourselves apart. Yeah, trusting the MSM was dumb. Lesson learned, move on.
I get why we're all on edge - we've spent the last century being cucked and betrayed by our leadership, so anything that so much as hints of pulling back off the accelerator sets all of us off onto the blackpill. There is absolutely no need for this at this time. Everything at this point is just words - the single concrete action we have at this point is Sessions nominated for AG, and that's a home-run. Everything else: from Clinton will she/won't she be investigated, to NPI shenanigans, doesn't matter. Take a step back.
Trump is, despite MSM bullshit, a civic nationalist with relatively moderate views, and he has a natural reaction to punch back no matter where the punch comes from. This is a great strength for us, because we can goad our enemies into making Trump one of us by making things so unbearable they lash out. Hamilton is the sort of thing that pushes Trump more towards us. Riots and BLM push Trump towards us. But forcing Trump to get involved in our own drama pushes him away. Let the enemy do the dirty work for us.
We're not going to change the culture overnight. Sure, no cucking, but you're delusional if you think we're going to maintain our coalition of normies in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania if you go tying the GodEmperor to fascist symbols in the current year. That's not cucking, that's common sense. Either go full fash and push the Overton Window to the right as an independent, or play the normie-friendly version of the alt-right for now and get behind Trump. You can't do both - I don't decide that, you don't decide that, the normie decides that. That's democracy for you. Normies will abandon us completely if they think we've got nothing more to offer than goosesteps.
Look at the liberals. In 2005, they were telling conservatives that DOMA wasn't necessary, that marriage should be left to the states - isn't that your principles anyway? And of course, they were all lying, and a decade later were cheering the top-down mandate for gay marriage. But in 2005, none of them purity spiraled, none of them started screaming, because they all knew it was a ploy to deceive us. They knew that their leadership had no intention of 'leaving it up to the states', they just needed to make sure we didn't act while we had the power to do so.
Same deal with Clinton sighing DADT. The same people who put it into law led the charge that it was outdated and cheered its demise. They knew Clinton wasn't cucking them out of what they wanted, they just knew that they had to slip us the decadence in bite-size pieces.
That's where we are today. It is much easier for Trump, and by extension us, if we can convince the normies that the fight on immigration is about 3 million felons, or that we're not interested in vindictive attacks on our political enemies, or that our policies are not fascist. Then once we've deported 3 million (and destroyed sanctuary cities because they're harboring said felons), we can move on to the next 3 million - say, illegals taking welfare, or whatever. And after that, we can deport the next batch, until we're back to demographics that reflect a nation and not an airport. Take the cake slice by slice, just like the other side have been doing to us our entire lives. It works.
Trump gets this. And we'd be better off nodding and winking until it's time for phase 2, than sperging about the need to have everything done tomorrow. And if we are betrayed, or allies turn out to be cucks, concern trolls, etc. then by all means fire the broadside. But let's not tear ourselves up because someone might be thinking about considering pulling a Romney.
We've come a long way, lads. But don't delude yourself: politically, we still need the normies on board. That doesn't mean cucking or moderating into nothing, but it does mean not running so far ahead of the crowd that we're no longer able to lead it. We didn't lose the nation over night, and unfortunately we won't win it back over night either.
End of day, what happened over the past few days is not a big deal as a single event. Normies are not going to ever remember it, and a good chunk that do see it will just assume it's the usual bullshit RACISS narrative of the MSM. The biggest danger here is we tear ourselves apart. Yeah, trusting the MSM was dumb. Lesson learned, move on.
I get why we're all on edge - we've spent the last century being cucked and betrayed by our leadership, so anything that so much as hints of pulling back off the accelerator sets all of us off onto the blackpill. There is absolutely no need for this at this time. Everything at this point is just words - the single concrete action we have at this point is Sessions nominated for AG, and that's a home-run. Everything else: from Clinton will she/won't she be investigated, to NPI shenanigans, doesn't matter. Take a step back.
Trump is, despite MSM bullshit, a civic nationalist with relatively moderate views, and he has a natural reaction to punch back no matter where the punch comes from. This is a great strength for us, because we can goad our enemies into making Trump one of us by making things so unbearable they lash out. Hamilton is the sort of thing that pushes Trump more towards us. Riots and BLM push Trump towards us. But forcing Trump to get involved in our own drama pushes him away. Let the enemy do the dirty work for us.
We're not going to change the culture overnight. Sure, no cucking, but you're delusional if you think we're going to maintain our coalition of normies in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania if you go tying the GodEmperor to fascist symbols in the current year. That's not cucking, that's common sense. Either go full fash and push the Overton Window to the right as an independent, or play the normie-friendly version of the alt-right for now and get behind Trump. You can't do both - I don't decide that, you don't decide that, the normie decides that. That's democracy for you. Normies will abandon us completely if they think we've got nothing more to offer than goosesteps.
Look at the liberals. In 2005, they were telling conservatives that DOMA wasn't necessary, that marriage should be left to the states - isn't that your principles anyway? And of course, they were all lying, and a decade later were cheering the top-down mandate for gay marriage. But in 2005, none of them purity spiraled, none of them started screaming, because they all knew it was a ploy to deceive us. They knew that their leadership had no intention of 'leaving it up to the states', they just needed to make sure we didn't act while we had the power to do so.
Same deal with Clinton sighing DADT. The same people who put it into law led the charge that it was outdated and cheered its demise. They knew Clinton wasn't cucking them out of what they wanted, they just knew that they had to slip us the decadence in bite-size pieces.
That's where we are today. It is much easier for Trump, and by extension us, if we can convince the normies that the fight on immigration is about 3 million felons, or that we're not interested in vindictive attacks on our political enemies, or that our policies are not fascist. Then once we've deported 3 million (and destroyed sanctuary cities because they're harboring said felons), we can move on to the next 3 million - say, illegals taking welfare, or whatever. And after that, we can deport the next batch, until we're back to demographics that reflect a nation and not an airport. Take the cake slice by slice, just like the other side have been doing to us our entire lives. It works.
Trump gets this. And we'd be better off nodding and winking until it's time for phase 2, than sperging about the need to have everything done tomorrow. And if we are betrayed, or allies turn out to be cucks, concern trolls, etc. then by all means fire the broadside. But let's not tear ourselves up because someone might be thinking about considering pulling a Romney.
We've come a long way, lads. But don't delude yourself: politically, we still need the normies on board. That doesn't mean cucking or moderating into nothing, but it does mean not running so far ahead of the crowd that we're no longer able to lead it. We didn't lose the nation over night, and unfortunately we won't win it back over night either.