What Is Culture?

On the one hand, writing this article feels a little pointless, because the same people who like to shout that white people have no culture also like to shout about how they wuz kangz with flying pyramids, so laying out a dialectical argument is perhaps not going to be very effective.

However, I see plenty of whites who when screamed at about no culture don't seem to have any response. My intention here therefore isn't to provide a dialectic rebuttal to the other side's idiots, but to give our own people so framework from which to form their own rhetoric. Good luck!

I will be referring to 'white culture'. This is a phenomena that really only exists in the United States and perhaps Canada: Europeans are not culturally homogenous. Spain is not Sweden is not Hungary. But, for the purposes of this essay these cultures are close enough - especially when compared to non-European cultures - that I believe the term is acceptable.

For simplicity's sake, there are two types of 'culture' that any given society produces. The first, and most obvious, is what I call 'high culture'. This encompasses culture that is produced for consumption, and is comprised of literature, music, performance and fine art, architecture, sports, holidays, science, language, religion... you get the picture. Shakespeare is high culture. So is NASCAR.

For high culture, it is fairly easy to rebut enemy claims, which it is why it is usually only googles who make it. Most of the world plays soccer. White Culture. Baseball, American football, hockey, basketball... products of white culture. Disney films primarily based off of fairy tales: white culture based off of white culture. The Aircraft Carrier. White Culture. Sure, your Shaqwanda or Tyrone are going to deny this, and your problem glasses feminist or resident Echoberg will try and claim everything actually stems from some Aztec or Iroquois or Arab, but the fact is that the cultural output by whites in everything from throwing a ball to performing a play to landing on the moon is so blatant and overwhelming that there's no real danger of whites not being able to defend their own on this turf, unless they're determined to cuck in which case nothing I say matters anyway.

The only exception is music where whites tend to be happy to cuck even when they wouldn't otherwise, and accept black claims that all music is stolen from them to a greater or lesser degree. To which I'd ask how they can claim reasonably Jazz when they can't claim the saxophone or the piano. Or Music Theory. White musical tradition is as rich as relevant as any other part of our culture, and we should not let them get away with this, but again - it's not particularly difficult to make third parties realize that 'whites have no culture' is a bullshit claim, even for music.

But then there is what I'll term 'low culture', which isn't any less meaningful but is much more passive, less overt than its high culture counterpart, but in many ways is the most important.

Low culture is the often unspoken, unwritten rules that define how members of that culture interact. For instance, how does a culture respond to authority? Between civilian and warriors, police, bureaucrats? Juniors to Seniors? Sons to Fathers? Employees to Employers? When we talk, we understand that there is a cultural difference on this issue between say, Americans and Japanese. Even though there's no tangible culture in the same way we see a cultural difference between anime and western cartoons.

That's hardly the only one. The role of family, both nuclear and extended. How are morals and ethics valued? High versus Low Trust societies. Public versus Private space. Concept of Adulthood. Expectations of Motherhood. For every group from Anglo to Aborigine, we could research each of these topics and we would discover 1. An overwhelming general trend within a group and 2. Significant difference between groups.

Here is the challenge. If some dindu comes up and starts going on and on about no culture, it doesn't sound very convincing to rebut with well actually, we do have a culture, and it's centered around a high-trust homogenous society with a historical streak of egalitarian libertarianism that is acknowledged but kept in check by a traditionally strong church and...

Which is unfortunate, because that's the part of the culture these people immigrated to our countries for. They didn't come because we invent great sports or have funny musicals or figured out how to make airplanes; they came because culturally we have formed a very safe, very trusting society that is open to outsiders coming in and becoming not only wealthy, but actually benefitting from - again, culturally constructed - welfare programs built on a national sense of 'help your neighbor'.

It is therefore very important that other whites be made to see that this is what is going on. Once our wealth and safety are viewed as a direct consequence of a white culture, the outsider will naturally be viewed as a hostile cuckoo, not a friendly-but-unfortunate neighbor. Likewise, people might begin to realize that this safety is not guaranteed: as whites become a minority our culture will be replaced by their cultures: which generally range from persecuting outsiders, to tolerating the useful ones with the occasional purge thrown in, to full out rape-and-murder.

I urge you, the next time a 'no culture' claim is made, to not only score the rhetorical points on the obvious contributions of whites in high culture, but to point out that the very threads of the society they live in are the result of white people codifying their interactions with one another over centuries. You won't make any headway against those people in particular, but you may make an important point to bystanders - and when you're arguing with googles, it's the bystanders you're really reaching out to anyway.

Nikki Goes To New York

Trump isn't always playing 4D chess. He makes mistakes.

Nimrata Randhawa for UN Ambassador isn't one of them. This is brilliant. Consider:

1. South Carolina now can elect a governor who actually understands and supports South Carolina.

2. Globalists in the UN have precisely nothing to rally around. They don't get an old school neocon or Israeli-firster with deep connections. They get a lightweight governor who hits the multicultural check-boxes and little else. No leverage, no conduit into the administration.

3. Epic troll move. Trump has neutralized the first wave of 'muh women, muh minorities'. And even better, he gave her a worthless position that nobody can admit it worthless. Globalists have to pretend that the UN ambassador is a prestigious, meaningful position in the US power structure. But of course they know it's not. Nikki can wine and dine in Manhattan and be the face of Diversity, Inc while the rest of us get down to the work of Making America Great Again. Win-win.

This won't shut up the Raciss, Sexiss crowd for good of course, but we don't care if they shout anyway. What this does do though is discredit them to normies if they start shouting too loudly. It makes Trump look less dangerous, less radical... all while the left rants impotently and we start shipping people south of the wall as fast as the buses can run.

I expect to see several moves like this from Trump. Positions that really matter for our top priorities - restoring this nation's demographics and getting rid of those that want to kill us - must go to white men of good nationalist character. Men like Sessions and Kobach. Attorney General. State. Defense. Energy & Interior also deserve worthy candidates dedicated to Winning as well. But the UN? Smoke and mirrors my friends. Hell, I wouldn't be terribly surprised if Romney gets some position that he can go full economic wonk on, restructuring like the Salt Lake Olympics, but something that is low profile enough and "bipartisan" and won't make Romney the number one cuck in 2024. Something that everyone agrees needs fixing. Romney, Gabbard, Webb: those types will do for us what people like McCain and Specter do for the left.

Use the labor of our enemies for our own interests. This is what the left has done to whites for my entire life. Tables are turning.

Remember everyone, Trump spent months mocking Obama and Hillary for broadcasting their plans to our enemies in advance; we don't want or expect Trump to give the enemy our roadmap before we're even officially in the driver's seat.

Keep Your Powder Dry

We haven't won anything yet. We don't have the wall. We don't even have the White House for another 60 days, and you can be sure the usual suspects are going to come up with some bullshit to try between then and now. Be great if we could keep the coalition together for a while longer - we all want them to go back.

End of day, what happened over the past few days is not a big deal as a single event. Normies are not going to ever remember it, and a good chunk that do see it will just assume it's the usual bullshit RACISS narrative of the MSM. The biggest danger here is we tear ourselves apart. Yeah, trusting the MSM was dumb. Lesson learned, move on.

I get why we're all on edge - we've spent the last century being cucked and betrayed by our leadership, so anything that so much as hints of pulling back off the accelerator sets all of us off onto the blackpill. There is absolutely no need for this at this time. Everything at this point is just words - the single concrete action we have at this point is Sessions nominated for AG, and that's a home-run. Everything else: from Clinton will she/won't she be investigated, to NPI shenanigans, doesn't matter. Take a step back.

Trump is, despite MSM bullshit, a civic nationalist with relatively moderate views, and he has a natural reaction to punch back no matter where the punch comes from. This is a great strength for us, because we can goad our enemies into making Trump one of us by making things so unbearable they lash out. Hamilton is the sort of thing that pushes Trump more towards us. Riots and BLM push Trump towards us. But forcing Trump to get involved in our own drama pushes him away. Let the enemy do the dirty work for us.

We're not going to change the culture overnight. Sure, no cucking, but you're delusional if you think we're going to maintain our coalition of normies in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania if you go tying the GodEmperor to fascist symbols in the current year. That's not cucking, that's common sense. Either go full fash and push the Overton Window to the right as an independent, or play the normie-friendly version of the alt-right for now and get behind Trump. You can't do both - I don't decide that, you don't decide that, the normie decides that. That's democracy for you. Normies will abandon us completely if they think we've got nothing more to offer than goosesteps.

Look at the liberals. In 2005, they were telling conservatives that DOMA wasn't necessary, that marriage should be left to the states - isn't that your principles anyway? And of course, they were all lying, and a decade later were cheering the top-down mandate for gay marriage. But in 2005, none of them purity spiraled, none of them started screaming, because they all knew it was a ploy to deceive us. They knew that their leadership had no intention of 'leaving it up to the states', they just needed to make sure we didn't act while we had the power to do so.

Same deal with Clinton sighing DADT. The same people who put it into law led the charge that it was outdated and cheered its demise. They knew Clinton wasn't cucking them out of what they wanted, they just knew that they had to slip us the decadence in bite-size pieces.

That's where we are today. It is much easier for Trump, and by extension us, if we can convince the normies that the fight on immigration is about 3 million felons, or that we're not interested in vindictive attacks on our political enemies, or that our policies are not fascist. Then once we've deported 3 million (and destroyed sanctuary cities because they're harboring said felons), we can move on to the next 3 million - say, illegals taking welfare, or whatever. And after that, we can deport the next batch, until we're back to demographics that reflect a nation and not an airport. Take the cake slice by slice, just like the other side have been doing to us our entire lives. It works.

Trump gets this. And we'd be better off nodding and winking until it's time for phase 2, than sperging about the need to have everything done tomorrow. And if we are betrayed, or allies turn out to be cucks, concern trolls, etc. then by all means fire the broadside. But let's not tear ourselves up because someone might be thinking about considering pulling a Romney.

We've come a long way, lads. But don't delude yourself: politically, we still need the normies on board. That doesn't mean cucking or moderating into nothing, but it does mean not running so far ahead of the crowd that we're no longer able to lead it. We didn't lose the nation over night, and unfortunately we won't win it back over night either.