We Wuz U

In the past few weeks, the We Wuz Kangz crowd has taken it up a level. Spiderman's back in the news as being redone as mystery meat (and I believe not for the first time). We're supposed to celebrate that the transformation of Stockholm, North America is now complete, as the first ever BLACK Santa takes his place in the Mall of America, Mogadishu-on-Mississippi. Barbie is to be voiced by (((Amy Schumer))). And now we've got students at UPenn replacing a picture of Shakespeare in the English department with some mannish black power feminist in proto-problem glasses.

The end game is the destruction of white culture, so that they can claim that there is not and never was a white culture. And once there is no white culture, there will be no white people - and therefore no right to white communities or nations.

Genocide like a loaf of bread - slice by slice.

What's important here though is that this isn't the normal dindu We Wuz Kangz at work. We Wuz Kangz are generally a bunch of loud-mouthed retards who stand in the street in brightly colored robes and talk about how Cleopatra, Hannibal, Jesus, and King Tut were pretty much indistinguishable form your modern African-American google. This didn't really matter because nobody really is at all surprised that blacks don't understand that geography. Even though the whole continent is "Africa", the Sahara acted as a major barrier which, combined with the movement through the Mediterranean, meant that North Africa was historically more a part of the Middle East and Southern Europe than it was African, and certainly not Bantu Africa. Much like how Armenia isn't exactly filled with Chinese.

Nobody expects your average black to grasp this, so people just left it alone and if they wanted to put up a black Santa or LARP that there was more to black Africa than marveling at the architectural achievements of termites, then whatever. Annoying at times but not dangerous. And you can't really blame them for trying their honest best to put two and two together and then cheerfully deducing that of all options, five is the highest so let's roll with it.

Now though, (((other groups))), as well as virtue-signaling white opportunists, have decided to throw down with this as a tool to attack the white majority. And like most things black, once they are a weapon in someone else's hand they can actually be quite dangerous.

Expect it to pick up, and to move from the abstract of make believe holidays like Kwanzaa or long dead figures like King Tut and George Washington Carver, to more current and physical lies. Google is already doing this in its doodles (see the Juno team doodle vs. the actual team makeup, or their veteran's day doodles), as well as on their algorithms for searches like "American Engineers". This past year, Hermione Granger was played by a black woman, and despite seven books and everyone knowing damn well what's up, Rowling simply smirked, well, it never says explicitly, she's white. Right, and if I wrote a book about a witch named Kim in a school in Seoul without ever saying she wasn't Korean, you'd buy it a decade later when I told you she was a blond girl from Buffalo.

This is why though I don't countersignal with words like "sportsball" or mock those who aren't interested (yet) in fighting the race war at large but just want to protect the integrity of video games or comics or whatever - these are important fronts. And while it would be ridiculous for all of us to spend all our energies on them, the fact that we have stay behind crews willing to keep toiling away on them is not something to be dismissed. The enemy has people like this too - any front we abandon at all, for any length of time, will see ground lost. We must not allow our heritage to be stripped from us, in any way. Either in this overtly obnoxious way of saying it was always someone else's, but in the more insiduous way of declaring white culture, "global".

This is their second style of cultural destruction, and has been around for a while. Space Exploration, for instance, is a "human" achievement. Nevermind that this achievement centered around Germanics vs. Slavs, and even today has only expanded to include more types of Europeans and East Asians.

Tolkien, who explicitly wrote The Hobbit as an act of love for the AngloSaxon, ironically, because he felt that our ancient myths had been stolen from us when a conquered people, is never described as such. Try and declare Lord of The Rings to be an explicitly Anglo cultural work and you'll be mocked or insulted.

But today, Tolkien is global. Disney is global. Beethoven is global. Granted, it's a step up from Tolkien wuz kangz, but it's just a slightly more palatable cultural genocide. Still leads to our destruction.

No subversion of our culture that seeks to deny our position in it ought be tolerated.

Fourth Estate, Fifth Column, Trump's Sixth Sense

Oh no! Trump told a rally on his "Thank You" tour that he isn't really interested in locking Hillary up. Shut it down!

The media is of course gloating about this betrayal of the base, from twitter to the MSM.

Good. Let them sell us the rope.

The left makes three fundamental errors regarding both Trump and the presidency:

1. The president is the boss of all branches of government. This is what they believe. This is why they saw no legal barrier (they never had a moral one) to Obama doing whatever he wanted, and why their concern about Republican presidents is always one of fear of the always assumed dictatorial powers now in the hands of the enemy.

2. That Trump (and his followers) are complete idiots.

3. That they cannot help themselves at biting at bait regarding the above. Trump already trolled them with the flag protection proposal.

Do you really think there's nothing more going on here than Trump dismissing a huge part of his base's enthusiasm at his own victory tour? Or is Trump, a man with a lifetime of playing with the media and two years of being the undisputed master of it, doing something more?

Here's what I see:

- Trump, contrary to how Democrats picture it, personally has no legal authority to go after Hillary as president. That is up to Congress to investigate, the FBI to investigate, and for the AG (Sessions, aka not-a-cuck) to prosecute. Trump has leverage over all these groups to differing and greater or lesser degrees, but they are all officially independent in their investigations and conclusions.

- So Trump says he's not interesting in doing something now that, as president, wasn't his job anyway. And the media, convinced Trump is an idiot and unable to resist trying to blackpill those of us on the train, are busy writing articles about how Trump has no intention of hitting Hillary now. They are producing a paper trail alibi for Trump and they don't even notice.

- If Congress, the FBI, and the AG cannot for whatever reason get Hillary, Trump shrugs and says that's in the past and he's said so for months that he has more important things to do. This is, technically, true. Wall & Deportations > Clinton, every time. It's also true because again, going after Hillary wasn't something the president is supposed to do.


- If (we hope and pray and believe there will be), there is an indictment, then the MSM will gear up to paint the whole thing as a politically motivated hitjob... and the Trump administration will have phonebooks worth of documentation from the exact same members of the press, gloating that president-elect Trump has no such intentions whatsoever.

Progressives, BTFO. We will never get tired of winning.

Throw in the fact that right now, Obama has to weigh the public optics of a pardon against the risk of it being needed. No sense in being seen to throw out the smoking gun if no investigation is forthcoming anyway. This is especially true if Obama wants to try and play the Washington elder statesman role rather than pissing off to Hawaii like he should.

Trump is all about violating his enemy's expectations. He railed in the campaign about this, particularly regarding ISIS and Obama's administration releasing military schedules, but it was a general theme and has been all of Trump's life. Trump is giving his enemies nothing to work with, while making them work for him.

 No blackpills, fam. When and only when Trump actually starts implementing a cuck policy is it time to fire the broadside. I know we're not used to having a leader who smiles and assures our enemies while he prepares the kidney shiv (something the other side does often and well - DOMA, DADT...), but I truly believe we have such a man now. Give him the opportunity to work the magic.

Rural Aesthetics (UK Edition)

Earlier, I wrote about how there is a large element of culture that generally goes unnoticed in and of itself, but that significantly contributes to the general spirit of the nation. I called this ‘low culture’ not as a snub, but because it is less at the forefront of the mind than say, the cultural impact of Star Wars or Pablo Picasso.

I classified architecture as ‘high culture’ – certainly the Sydney Opera House or Empire State Building are – and even in a more general sense, city designs and public buildings change from country to country and make a noticeable, publicly recognized difference. But what gets less coverage is just as important – the rural aesthetic.

As my penname suggests, I am an Anglo-Saxon, and have close ties with England. I will use England as my example here, but have seen the same pattern, though the specifics obviously differ.

For me, the English countryside has three distinguishing, man-made features: Walls, Farmhouses, and the Freedom to Roam.

Walls: Walls in the English countryside are generally drywall, and are everywhere. Not just along well-farmed estates, but in desolate moorland and up mountains in the Lake District or further north along scree-laden slopes that it seems ridiculous anyone would have ever bothered to climb, let alone while carrying and rearranging heavy stones for miles and miles. This is different from Scotland where, in my experience, they only built walls where it was sensible and purposeful to do so.

In addition, stone walls in England have jagged tops. I have been told by locals, though I have never confirmed through any written source, that this is because it prevents heavy buildup of snow. By contrast, Irish stone walls have flat tops. This makes for an interesting transition in the north of England, where walls around Liverpool and then up through Lancashire have quite a few ‘Irish’ walls, a legacy of Irish laborers who came to that area looking for work. Then as one moves westwards towards and across the Pennines, the walls become increasingly ‘English’.

Farmhouses: Old farmhouses too are generally made of stone, as are the outbuildings. It lasts in a way wood does not, especially in a wet climate, and England has had centuries of having to treat local timber as a high-value strategic resource. Up north, the farmhouses increasingly resemble fortresses, which stems from the fact that they often were, back when Anglo and Pict and Scot didn’t let something as trivial as national borders or Common Law get in the way of a good old-fashioned bloodbath.

I have spent less time hiking in the south of England than the north, but the farmland is more prosperous and also closer to the urban centers, and so while there is still a heavy use of stone, they don’t tend to double as a defense against a medium-sized army of sheep raiders. There is an interesting juxtaposition in Yorkshire – particularly around Richmond and York – which were historically very prosperous and it shows in the farm houses. These are very nice fortresses.

Freedom to Roam: Scottish law is similar but slightly different from England & Wales. In all cases though, the general gist is that if a footpath has existed, the public has a right to walk upon it. The public also has the right to ‘roam’ on public lands, where ‘roam’ means the right to walk, to sit and rest, and in a delightfully British way of speaking, the right to picnic and watercolour. If the land is held privately (such as on a farm), the farmer may reroute you but must provide a route through that is reasonable: he can direct you around the edge of a field rather than through it; he can’t send you three miles down the road.

‘Commons’ in England are much more common in the north than in the south, due to urban growth and the enclosure acts back when industrialization was starting up. The Commons today tends to be very marginal land, and when used is pretty much used for sheep grazing and grouse hunting, with little infrastructure beyond the ubiquitous stone walls and the occasional stone cabin that serves while hunting said grouse.

The net result is a web of public footpaths all interconnected to common land such that it is possible to go from Land’s End to John O’Groats on foot without more than few miles of walking on a road.

I guarantee that not once have you been in an argument about whether British people have culture, and someone brought up the freedom to roam and the right to watercolour a pointy-topped stone wall. But in sum, the result is that you can be anywhere in England and not only know that you are in England without a sign or another person, but you can know in broad terms where in England you are. 

It results in a cohesive national identity with all the regional diversity that progressives insist only comes from importing Mogadishu. It is the result of a high trust society where a stranger is still a countryman and so can be trusted onto one’s land to do nothing more but walk across and admire the view. It is lovely, and if you go to England I highly recommend taking time out of the London – Oxford – Stonehenge – Edinburgh blitz and spending as long as you can in the Cotswolds, The Wye River Valley, the Norfolk Broads, The Yorkshire Dales and Moors, the Lake District, the Pennine Way, Snowdonia, West Highland Way... take your pick. 

When Carson Is Tapped, You Are Not Racist

Regarding Republicans, "The Magic Negro" refers to the conservative desire to find a black man who holds all the right conservative views but whose skin color will, finally, for real this time, prove to the leftists who hold the keys to Georgetown Dinner Parties that they are not racist. "The Magic Negro" is slightly different in reference to the left, primarily because they don't care about what Republicans think of them. In reference to the left, "The Magic Negro" is a black man who is coherent and capable enough that he can run as the front man and so bludgeon conservatives on their racism and privilege.

Ben Carson was the Magic Negro of 2016, replacing Herman Cain, who in turn had replaced Colin Powell. It's somewhat important to note that the term "Magic Negro" does not inherently marginalize the individual's actual talents, but merely mocks the idea that that talent somehow justifies being made the leader of a national political party. I say inherently because frankly, there are Magic Negros who aren't even particularly good in their supposed area of expertise, but simply are nonthreatening enough and the cuck desperate enough to let even that deficiency slide. Neil Degrasse Tyson is the most current example of the full blown case, and if I had a time machine I'd bet my last Reese's Pieces that George Washington Carver would at the very least be a borderline case.

There are certainly those that think Carson and Cain fall into that camp of being all shuck and jive, and others who acknowledge that the two are indeed Magic Negros but that it is unfair to claim they don't have a very respectable list of core competencies. Pick you poison.

As an aside, my preferred term for Magic Negros in modern parlance is "Google Plus".

So with that out the way - Ben Carson has been tapped to head up HUD. With an understanding of what we mean by Magic Negro, and that - politically, at the very least - Ben Carson is one, here are my thoughts:

1. If anyone could marginalize that Magic Negro card, it's Trump. Trump is rewarding Carson for his loyalty, and while there's probably a good chunk of influence demanding to have a Magic Negro in the cabinet, it's a lot less an influence on Trump as it would be for a cuck. Trump is under no illusions that by choosing Carson he's tapping into a magical force that will neutralize his opponents, nor does he take screams of RACISS seriously.

2. Carson has actually lived in public housing, so I'm counting this as a plus. This isn't always the case - I wouldn't want a guy who had never been employed to be in charge of Labor on the basis that he "knows how tough it can be" (arguments as to whether anyone should be in charge of Labor notwithstanding). But just as I think there should always be a non-lawyer, non-Ivy SCOTUS justice, Having a guy in charge of a department where he had to eat some of the shit handed out by said dept... well, why not give it a whirl?

3. And... not much else. Carson was loyal, is not a lifetime politican and has seen the end-user side of the department, but he lacks any depth in relevant experience and is a danger of being given a pass (by the right) for being a Magic Negro.

I'm giving him a 6/10. If he were white, he'd be seen at best as a smart loyalist who is bland enough to not offend any wing of the party. That he's not a Bushman would give him a +1 with the party base. So 6/10 if white, 6/10 as black.

Personally, I wish HUD would be weaponized to shove diversity down the throats of those who like to virtue signal that America needs more diversity. Section 8 housing at Martha's Vineyard. Subsidized housing to move kebab (before final deportation) from Ohio to San Francisco. Urban Development that moves yahoos into (((homogeneous neighborhoods))). Properly enriching top tier public schools.

But that's probably a step too far for most people right now, so using HUD to repay a Trump loyalist who hopefully is up to the task seems the next best thing.

Election Pop Quiz

In memory of the big, beautiful election we just had: Remembering The Primaries

1. Before he was low-energy, Jeb! was
A) An embarrassment
B) A big, fat mistake
C) A mess
D) A real tough guy


2. "Disgusting" BEST describes:
A) John Kasich eating a Hoagie
B) DNC abusing Bernie supporters
C) Hillary lying about Honest Abe
D) Rosie O'Donnell


3. Who of the following was the first person, who, to be very honest with you, shouldn't even be here tonight?
A) Jeb Bush
B) Ted Cruz
C) John Kasich
D) Little Marco


4. A water bottle represented Marco Rubio's:
A) Foam parties
B) Profuse sweat
C) Spittle
D) On-screen water drinking


5. Chris Christie famously committed a murder-suicide against this Cuban:
A) Ted Cruz
B) Fidel Castro
C) Marco Rubio
D) John Kasich's sandwich


6. Trump will NEVER:
A) Win a primary
B) Get 25% of the vote in a primary
C) Even be competitive in a purple state
D) All of the above


7. Before Jeb!, there was:
A) Forward with Jeb
B) Stand Tough With Jeb
C) Jeb Can Fix It
D) Jeb For President


8. This candidate actually lost to Trump, twice:
A) Newt Gingrich
B) Carly Fiorina
C) Ben Carson
D) Rand Paul


9. Trump first broke the 50% ceiling officially in this historically racist state:
A) Georgia
B) Connecticut
C) Mississippi
D) Texas


10. Jeb! was interrupted and forced to stop mid-speech by his hosts at:
A) A Relay-For-Life fundraiser
B) A church picnic
C) A fundraising event in a private home.
D) A Rotary Club meeting

Drain The 9th Circle Of Hell

California went Democrat at a rate of 2:1, and is at the point of serious-not-serious as to whether or not it can tolerate being tied to the rest of us.

Hawaii, America's great Coldwar Exhibit A that The Free World, Inc. was open to non-white majority countries, went by the same ratio.

So did the People's Republic of Massachusetts.

The nation's capital, on the other hand, went to Clinton by an absolutely staggering 19:1. This is Yuge.

Now yes, I am aware that California, Hawaii, and Massachusetts are states, and therefore have some degree of variance throughout. But consider: The San Francisco area peaked at 75%. Parts of Boston pushed towards 90% but the city as a whole was around 80%. New York City was around 80%. Atlanta, in the mid 70's. Portlandia, 70's. Seattle, 70's. Chicago, 75%. Even Baltimore... 85%. So even when only compared to the bluest of the blue urban areas, Washington, D.C. is an extreme outlier.

The only thing this election more alarming (though not unrelated), was the fact that somehow not a single national paper was in sync with half the country, comprising north of fifty-million voters. Looking at DC, the only conclusion is that we are ruled by a capital that has less in common with the people it claims the authority to govern than London ever had with India or Versailles had with The Vendée. Something many of us have always instinctively understood, but it's amazing to see it play out by the numbers, every four years. It is a city that is foreign, hostile, and absolutely thrilled to find itself so separated from the occupied territories.

President Donald J. Trump is literally entering a warzone. Keep your memes locked and your shitposts loaded lads; we won an important battle that the enemy couldn't really believe was actually being fought. But now they are terrified, and the next battle is on a battlefield that they know well and where every pedocuck and (((global lobbyist))) has spent a lifetime honing xir skills. Things are going to get much worse before they get better, because the swamp is going to do everything it can to avoid being drained.

But when it does, I believe that the change - the sudden disappearance of an oppression so old it never fully registered - will be so profound on the American people that liberalism can be destroyed for generations. This is why we must win, and to do that we must appreciate how desperate the enemy will be to prevent us from doing so. Don't get cocky.

An Elite Without A People...

...And now, it appears, a faction without a leader.

As contradictory as those two statements may appear, Trump may have twisted the #NeverTrump cucks into this gloriously untenable position. By having Romney come bowing and scraping, he has denied the #NeverTrump the remaining front-man of any sign that he opposed Trump on true principal. This group is done.

Bill Kristol
David French
Egg McMuffin
Glenn Beck
Mitt Romney

About the only one left is Paul Ryan, and one would think he'd take a look at all the corpses over the past year and decide that hey, working to pass President Trump's agenda as House Speaker is what he's wanted to do the whole time.

And if he forgets, he'll be gone next time around too. He's got two years to rehabilitate, and that clock is ticking.

Things are looking good. By the time January 20th rolls around, internal opposition will be utterly crushed, we will have moral authority to do a complete audit of the voting system, courtesy of libtards screaming about Michigan and Wisconsin, and we will be able to roll through the nomination process of cabinet members and a SCOTUS justice without a peep about muh sacred filibuster.

We're winning. And we're nowhere close to being tired of it.

And if we're in a position to start the first inning with a declaration that not only are we deporting all illegal criminals already noted on the books, but we're going to do a precinct-by-precinct audit and deport w/o possibility of return any illegal who voted, then that would just make my Christmas.